Duplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting is a problem CFOs and COOs need to see together, since neither owns the full picture alone.
2026-09-01
Read moreDuplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting teams means the same policy number, premium, or treaty term gets typed by hand more than once.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs has a real, measurable P&L impact, showing up as renewal drift, mispriced exceptions, and slower recovery from disputes.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs can be captured before it walks out the door, by building lightweight documentation habits into the normal course of work.
2026-09-01
Read moreIf institutional knowledge kept getting lost in workflow handoffs, renewal quality and dispute outcomes would be the first things to break, and boards should watch both closely.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs forces reinsurance leaders to choose between relying on tenure and building systems that capture judgment on purpose.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs is the cost of tribal knowledge leaving with the employee, taking years of undocumented judgment out the door in a single exit.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems has a real P&L cost, even though it rarely appears as its own line item.
2026-09-01
Read morePaying down integration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems works best as a staged roadmap, not a single big-bang project.
2026-09-01
Read moreBoards are starting to ask whether management can actually prove it has control of integration debt between core systems, not just describe it.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems forces a specific decision that reinsurance CTOs can only postpone, not avoid.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems is the quiet reason every new feature takes longer to ship than the last one.
2026-09-01
Read moreLegacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures don't just create IT friction, they quietly erode margin and capital efficiency deal by deal.
2026-09-01
Read moreOperating controls can contain the risk of legacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures while a longer-term fix is planned, without pretending the workarounds are a permanent solution.
2026-09-01
Read moreBoard oversight of legacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures should focus on what business is being turned away, not just whether the system is still running.
2026-09-01
Read moreLegacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures force an executive decision, not just a technology backlog item, about how much future business the reinsurer is willing to keep turning away.
2026-09-01
Read moreWhen legacy core systems can't model the treaty structures underwriters actually want to write, reinsurers either force-fit the deal or lose it. Here's why this keeps happening.
2026-09-01
Read moreReconciling bordereaux by hand works for a handful of cedants but breaks down at scale. Here's why, and what automated reconciliation looks like instead.
2026-09-01
Read more