IFRS 17 Loss-Recovery Component for Reinsurance Held
On this page
- IFRS 17 Loss-Recovery Component: Accounting for Reinsurance Held on Onerous Contracts
- Key Takeaways
- What Is the IFRS 17 Loss-Recovery Component?
- How Is the Loss-Recovery Component Calculated?
- How Does the Loss-Recovery Component Behave After Day One?
- Worked Example: Loss-Recovery Component on a Quota Share
- When Does the Loss-Recovery Component Make a Difference?
- Which Loss-Recovery Component Mistakes Are Most Common?
- How Should Finance and Reinsurance Teams Implement It?
- How Does It Interact With Capital and Other Frameworks?
- What Are Practitioners Focusing on Now?
- Checklist for Heads of Reinsurance Accounting
- Key Terms
- Sources
- Frequently Asked Questions
IFRS 17 Loss-Recovery Component: Accounting for Reinsurance Held on Onerous Contracts
Last reviewed: November 2026
The IFRS 17 loss-recovery component is the part of a reinsurance contract held that recognises, upfront, the reinsurance recovery of losses booked on onerous underlying insurance contracts. It was added by the June 2020 amendments to IFRS 17, in paragraphs 66A–66B and B119C–B119F, to reduce the mismatch between an immediate loss on the gross side and a deferred gain on the reinsurance side.
The rule looks simple, but small choices about reinsurance timing, grouping and recovery percentages move real profit between periods. Getting it wrong shows up in the first quarter a group turns onerous.
This guide is for CFOs, heads of reinsurance accounting, chief actuaries and outwards reinsurance teams. It is general information, not accounting advice, so take professional advice on your own contracts and audit position.
Key Takeaways
- The loss-recovery component lets a cedent recognise reinsurance income at the same time as the loss on onerous underlying contracts.
- The amount is the underlying loss × the percentage of claims expected to be recovered, under paragraph B119D.
- It only applies if the reinsurance held is entered into before or at the same time as the onerous contracts are recognised (paragraph B119C).
- It then tracks the underlying loss component and is capped at the recoverable share (paragraph B119F).
- Under the premium allocation approach, the adjustment goes to the asset for remaining coverage instead of the CSM (paragraph 70A).
- Reinsurance timing, grouping and data links to the underlying contracts decide whether the relief is actually available.
What Is the IFRS 17 Loss-Recovery Component?
The loss-recovery component is a component of the asset for remaining coverage of a group of reinsurance contracts held. Paragraph 66B of IFRS 17 says it depicts the recovery of losses recognised under paragraphs 66(c)(i)–(ii) and 66A.
It mirrors the loss component on the gross side. The loss component tracks the loss on onerous issued contracts, and the loss-recovery component tracks how much of that loss the reinsurance is expected to recover.
One practical warning on language: in IFRS 17 work, "LRC" usually means the liability for remaining coverage. Spell out "loss-recovery component" in policies and reports to avoid confusion.
Why Did the IASB Add It?
The IASB added it because the original standard created a visible accounting mismatch. A cedent recognised the full loss on onerous underlying contracts immediately, while any gain on the related reinsurance was deferred in the reinsurance CSM.
The June 2020 amendments to IFRS 17 introduced paragraphs 66A–66B to address this. IFRS 17 itself applies for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.
How Is the Loss-Recovery Component Calculated?
Paragraph B119D sets the formula. The adjustment to the reinsurance CSM, and the income recognised, equals the loss on the underlying contracts multiplied by the percentage of claims on those contracts the entity expects to recover from the reinsurance held.
Three points shape the calculation in practice:
- The loss includes everything that made the group onerous. That can include expenses and the risk adjustment, not just claims.
- The percentage is a claims recovery percentage. For a quota share it is usually the ceded share, while for non-proportional cover it needs a documented estimate.
- Mixed groups need allocation. If an onerous group contains both reinsured and non-reinsured contracts, paragraph B119E requires a systematic and rational allocation of the loss.
When Does Paragraph 66A Apply?
Paragraph 66A applies when the entity recognises a loss on initial recognition of an onerous group, or on adding onerous contracts to a group. Paragraph B119C then adds a timing test.
The reinsurance contract held must be entered into before or at the same time as the onerous underlying contracts are recognised. Reinsurance bought afterwards does not create a loss-recovery component for that initial loss.
How Does Recognition Timing Interact With It?
Paragraph 62 lets an entity recognise a group of reinsurance contracts held early, at the date it recognises an onerous underlying group, if the reinsurance was entered into at or before that date. This stops proportionate reinsurance from missing the onerous loss because of the normal recognition delay in paragraph 62A.
For cedents, the operational point is clear. Treaty inception dates, signing dates and the dates underlying groups turn onerous must all be captured reliably.
How Does the Loss-Recovery Component Behave After Day One?
After initial recognition, the loss-recovery component is adjusted to follow the loss component of the underlying onerous group. Paragraph B119F caps it at the portion of the underlying loss component the entity expects to recover.
Two subsequent movements matter most:
- Reversals. As the underlying loss component reverses through claims and expenses incurred, the loss-recovery component reverses too.
- Changes in estimates. If the underlying group's fulfilment cash flows change in a way that does not adjust its CSM, paragraph 66(c)(i) says the related reinsurance change goes to profit or loss, not to the reinsurance CSM.
How Is It Presented?
Paragraph 86 treats amounts recognised for loss recoveries under paragraphs 66A–66B as amounts recovered from the reinsurer. Paragraph 66B adds that reversals are presented as reversals of recoveries and excluded from the allocation of premiums paid.
This keeps the reinsurance premium allocation clean. It also means the disclosure rollforwards must show the loss-recovery component separately.
Worked Example: Loss-Recovery Component on a Quota Share
The illustration below is simplified and uses EUR millions, with discounting already reflected in present values. It applies the general measurement model to both the underlying group and the reinsurance held.
Underlying group of issued contracts (onerous at initial recognition):
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| PV of future premiums | 1,000 |
| PV of future claims | 900 |
| PV of attributable expenses | 180 |
| Risk adjustment | 60 |
| Fulfilment cash flows (net outflow) | 900 + 180 + 60 − 1,000 = 140 |
| Loss recognised, and loss component | 140 |
Reinsurance held: a 30% quota share of claims, no ceding commission, entered into before the underlying contracts were issued.
| Step | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| PV of expected recoveries | 30% × 900 | 270 |
| PV of reinsurance premiums | 30% × 1,000 | 300 |
| Risk adjustment for risk transferred | 30% × 60 (illustrative) | 18 |
| Reinsurance fulfilment cash flows | 270 − 300 + 18 | −12 (net cost) |
| CSM before paragraph 66A | Equal and opposite to the net cost | 12 |
| Recovery percentage (B119D) | 270 ÷ 900 | 30% |
| Income under paragraph 66A | 140 × 30% | 42 |
| CSM after paragraph 66A | 12 + 42 | 54 |
| Reinsurance asset on day one | −12 + 54 | 42 = loss-recovery component |
Day-one profit or loss:
| Scenario | Underlying Loss | Reinsurance Income | Net Day-One Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reinsurance entered into before the underlying (66A applies) | −140 | +42 | −98 |
| Reinsurance bought after the group is recognised (B119C fails) | −140 | 0 | −140 |
Year 1 movements:
| Movement | Underlying Loss Component | Loss-Recovery Component | Profit or Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | 140 | 42 | — |
| 40% of the loss component reverses as claims and expenses are incurred | −56 | −16.8 | Presented as reversals of the loss component and of recoveries |
| Expected future claims rise by a PV of 50 (future service) | +50 | +15 (30% × 50) | −50 gross, +15 reinsurance under 66(c)(i) |
| Closing | 134 | 40.2 | — |
The closing loss-recovery component of 40.2 is still 30% of the underlying loss component of 134. That ratio is a useful reconciliation check at every close.
The lesson for cedents: the same reinsurance can be worth 42 of day-one relief or nothing, depending only on when it was entered into. Timing and data links matter as much as the reinsurance terms.
The lesson for reinsurance accountants: the 30% is applied to the whole loss, including the expense and risk adjustment parts. Your systems must hold the recovery percentage and the underlying loss component together, not in separate spreadsheets.
When Does the Loss-Recovery Component Make a Difference?
The relief matters most where onerous groups are common and reinsurance is bought in advance. The table maps typical situations to the likely outcome.
| Situation | Likely Outcome | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quota share in force before an onerous new-business group is issued | Loss-recovery component recognised | Paragraph 66A and the B119C timing test are both met |
| Reinsurance bought mid-year after a group was already recognised as onerous | No relief for the initial loss | B119C timing test fails |
| Annual XoL measured under the premium allocation approach | Adjust the asset for remaining coverage instead of the CSM | Paragraph 70A applies |
| Onerous group mixing reinsured and non-reinsured contracts | Allocate the loss on a systematic and rational basis | Paragraph B119E applies |
| Underlying group becomes more onerous after day one | Reinsurance change goes to profit or loss | Paragraph 66(c)(i) applies |
Which Loss-Recovery Component Mistakes Are Most Common?
Six mistakes recur in IFRS 17 reinsurance held work. Most of them are data and process problems rather than technical misreadings.
Missing the B119C Timing Test
Reinsurance signed late, or renewed after new business incepts, does not qualify for the initial loss. Without reliable inception and signing dates, teams can over- or under-state the relief.
Using the Wrong Recovery Percentage
The recovery percentage is taken from premium share rather than expected claims recovery. For non-proportional or capped covers, that shortcut can materially misstate the component.
No Link Between Underlying Groups and Treaties
Treaty cessions are not mapped to IFRS 17 groups. The team then cannot show which reinsurance covers which onerous group.
Ignoring Mixed Groups
An onerous group contains both reinsured and non-reinsured contracts. Without a B119E allocation, the full group loss is grossed up by the recovery percentage.
Breaching the B119F Cap
The loss-recovery component is updated for reinsurance changes but not reduced as the underlying loss component reverses. The carrying amount can then exceed the recoverable share of the loss.
Presenting Reversals in the Wrong Line
Reversals are netted into the allocation of reinsurance premiums. Paragraph 66B requires them to be presented as reversals of recoveries.
How Should Finance and Reinsurance Teams Implement It?
Implementation needs a shared data model between outwards reinsurance, actuarial and finance. The steps below are a practical sequence.
Which Data Must Be Captured?
| Data Item | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Treaty inception, signing and attachment basis | Evidences the B119C timing test |
| Mapping of policies and cessions to IFRS 17 groups | Links each treaty to the onerous groups it covers |
| Expected recovery percentage per treaty and group | Drives the B119D calculation |
| Underlying loss component by group, each period | Drives B119F adjustments and the cap |
| Split of reinsured and non-reinsured contracts in each group | Supports the B119E allocation |
| Measurement model used for the reinsurance held (GMM or PAA) | Decides between CSM and paragraph 70A treatment |
Which Questions Should the CFO Ask?
- Which onerous groups recognised this year had reinsurance in force beforehand, and which did not?
- How is the recovery percentage set for non-proportional and capped covers?
- Does the loss-recovery component reconcile to the underlying loss component at every close?
- Who owns the link between treaty data and IFRS 17 groups?
- Could a change to renewal timing increase day-one relief without changing the reinsurance itself?
For the close process around these numbers, see our guide to the quarterly close for reinsurance. For evidence that stands up to auditors, see audit-ready reinsurance reporting.
How Does It Interact With Capital and Other Frameworks?
The loss-recovery component is an IFRS 17 profit-timing mechanism. It does not change the economics of the reinsurance or its credit for regulatory capital.
Solvency II, local statutory regimes and rating agency models measure reinsurance on their own bases. Finance teams should explain to boards why IFRS 17 profit and solvency ratios can move differently for the same treaty.
Counterparty risk still matters. The reinsurance asset includes an allowance for the reinsurer's non-performance risk, so a weaker reinsurer reduces the value of the same recovery.
What Are Practitioners Focusing on Now?
With several IFRS 17 reporting cycles completed, the focus has moved from first-time adoption to repeatability. Auditors and analysts increasingly test how cedents evidence timing, grouping and recovery percentages.
The IASB is preparing to start a post-implementation review of IFRS 17, with its staff proposing a start in early 2027. Teams should feed in practical issues on reinsurance held and confirm the current position before changing methods.
Checklist for Heads of Reinsurance Accounting
Use this checklist before each reporting close.
- Every treaty has reliable inception, signing and attachment-basis dates recorded
- Cessions are mapped to IFRS 17 groups for every onerous group
- Recovery percentages are documented, especially for non-proportional covers
- B119C timing has been tested for each onerous group recognised in the period
- Mixed groups have a documented B119E allocation method
- The loss-recovery component reconciles to the underlying loss component and respects the B119F cap
- Reversals are presented as reversals of recoveries, not netted into premium allocation
- Treaty data flows into accounting from a controlled system, not manual re-keying
For the last point, a centralised reinsurance treaty management platform keeps terms, dates and settlement calculations in one place, and bordereaux reconciliation checks cessions and recoveries against the records.
Key Terms
Loss-recovery component: The part of the asset for remaining coverage of reinsurance held that depicts the recovery of losses on onerous underlying contracts.
Loss component: The part of the liability for remaining coverage that tracks the loss recognised on an onerous group of issued contracts.
Onerous group: A group of insurance contracts whose fulfilment cash flows are a net outflow at initial recognition.
Contractual service margin (CSM): The unearned profit, or for reinsurance held the deferred net cost or net gain, recognised as service is provided.
Recovery percentage: The percentage of claims on the underlying contracts that the entity expects to recover from the reinsurance held, used in B119D.
Premium allocation approach (PAA): A simplified measurement model available for short-coverage contracts, applied to reinsurance held under paragraph 69.
Asset for remaining coverage: The reinsurance held equivalent of the liability for remaining coverage, which contains the loss-recovery component.
Fulfilment cash flows: The present value of future cash flows plus the risk adjustment for non-financial risk.
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the IFRS 17 loss-recovery component?
The IFRS 17 loss-recovery component is part of the asset for remaining coverage of reinsurance contracts held. The loss-recovery component depicts the recovery of losses recognised on onerous underlying insurance contracts and is established or adjusted under paragraphs 66A and 66B of IFRS 17.
How is the IFRS 17 loss-recovery component calculated?
Under paragraph B119D, the loss-recovery component equals the loss recognised on the onerous underlying contracts multiplied by the percentage of claims on those contracts that the entity expects to recover from the reinsurance held. The same amount adjusts the reinsurance CSM and is recognised as income.
When does paragraph 66A of IFRS 17 apply?
Paragraph 66A of IFRS 17 applies when an entity recognises a loss on initial recognition of an onerous group of underlying contracts, or on adding onerous contracts to a group. Paragraph B119C adds that the reinsurance contract held must be entered into before or at the same time.
Why did the IASB introduce the loss-recovery component?
The IASB introduced the loss-recovery component in the June 2020 amendments to IFRS 17 to reduce an accounting mismatch. Before that change, a cedent recognised the full loss on onerous underlying contracts immediately while deferring the related reinsurance gain in the contractual service margin.
What happens to the loss-recovery component over time?
The loss-recovery component is adjusted under paragraph B119F to follow changes in the loss component of the underlying onerous group. The carrying amount cannot exceed the portion of the underlying loss component that the entity expects to recover from the reinsurance held.
Does the loss-recovery component apply under the premium allocation approach?
Yes. Under paragraph 70A of IFRS 17, when reinsurance contracts held are measured using the premium allocation approach, the entity applies paragraph 66A by adjusting the carrying amount of the asset for remaining coverage instead of the contractual service margin.
How is the loss-recovery component presented in profit or loss?
Amounts recognised for the recovery of losses under paragraphs 66A–66B are treated as amounts recovered from the reinsurer under paragraph 86. Reversals of the loss-recovery component are presented as reversals of recoveries and are excluded from the allocation of reinsurance premiums paid.
Does the loss-recovery component apply to non-proportional reinsurance?
The text of paragraphs 66A and B119C does not limit the loss-recovery component to proportional reinsurance. For non-proportional covers, estimating the percentage of underlying claims expected to be recovered needs more judgement, so the method should be documented and applied consistently.

Hitul Mistry
CEO, Insurnest
An InsurTech leader with more than a decade of experience across insurance and technology, focused on solving business problems with the help of technology. Has worked with brokers, insurance carriers, and reinsurance firms across the India, UAE, and US markets.
View LinkedIn profile →