Reinsurance Impact on Combined Ratio: Gross vs Net Results
On this page
- How Reinsurance Impacts the Combined Ratio: Reading Gross vs Net Results Correctly
- Key Takeaways
- How Does Reinsurance Impact the Combined Ratio?
- How Are Gross and Net Combined Ratios Calculated?
- How Does a Quota Share Change the Ratio?
- How Does Excess of Loss Change the Ratio?
- Worked Example: Quota Share vs Excess of Loss
- How Does IFRS 17 Change the Picture?
- When Does Net Look Better or Worse Than Gross?
- Which Mistakes Lead to Misreading Net Results?
- How Should CFOs and Analysts Read Gross vs Net?
- What Does the Market Look Like for 2027?
- Checklist for CFOs and Heads of Reinsurance Accounting
- Key Terms
- Sources
- Frequently Asked Questions
How Reinsurance Impacts the Combined Ratio: Reading Gross vs Net Results Correctly
Last reviewed: November 2026
Reinsurance impact on combined ratio is the difference between an insurer's underwriting ratio before reinsurance (gross) and after reinsurance (net). A quota share with a high ceding commission can make the net ratio look better than gross, while an excess of loss programme usually makes it look worse in quiet years and better in heavy loss years.
The direction of the change says little about whether reinsurance created value. A lower net combined ratio can come with a lower underwriting profit.
This guide is for CFOs, CUOs, chief actuaries, heads of reinsurance accounting and analysts. It explains how each type of reinsurance moves the ratio, shows a worked example and covers what IFRS 17 changes.
Key Takeaways
- The gross combined ratio shows underwriting quality; the net combined ratio shows the retained result after reinsurance.
- A quota share leaves the loss ratio unchanged but moves the expense ratio, depending on the ceding commission rate.
- A ceding commission above the cedent's own expense ratio can lower the net ratio while reducing profit.
- Excess of loss raises the net ratio in quiet years and lowers it in large loss years, reducing volatility.
- Reinstatement premiums reduce net premium in loss years and belong in the cost of the event.
- IFRS 17 presents reinsurance separately and does not define a combined ratio, so definitions must be checked.
How Does Reinsurance Impact the Combined Ratio?
Reinsurance changes all three parts of the calculation: premium, losses and expenses. The net effect depends on the type of cover and the year's loss experience.
Proportional reinsurance shrinks premium, losses and expenses in the same proportion, apart from the commission. Non-proportional reinsurance reduces premium every year but only reduces losses when a layer is hit.
The two families are compared in more depth in our guide to proportional vs non-proportional reinsurance.
How Are Gross and Net Combined Ratios Calculated?
The combined ratio is the loss ratio plus the expense ratio. Gross uses figures before reinsurance, and net uses figures after reinsurance.
| Component | Gross basis | Traditional net basis |
|---|---|---|
| Premium | Gross earned premium | Gross earned premium minus ceded premium and reinstatement premiums |
| Losses | Gross incurred losses | Gross incurred losses minus reinsurance recoveries |
| Expenses | Acquisition and admin expenses | Expenses minus ceding commissions |
| Loss ratio | Gross losses ÷ gross premium | Net losses ÷ net premium |
| Expense ratio | Expenses ÷ gross premium | Net expenses ÷ net premium |
Some insurers use written premium for the expense ratio. Always check which premium base sits under each ratio.
How Does a Quota Share Change the Ratio?
A quota share leaves the net loss ratio unchanged, because premium and losses are ceded in the same proportion. It moves the expense ratio up or down depending on whether the ceding commission rate is above or below the cedent's own expense ratio.
If the commission exceeds the cedent's expense ratio, the excess is sometimes called an overriding commission. The net expense ratio falls, and the net combined ratio improves.
The improvement is not the same as profit. The reinsurer still keeps its expected margin, so the cedent's underwriting result in currency terms usually falls.
How Does Excess of Loss Change the Ratio?
Excess of loss premium reduces net earned premium every year, but recoveries only reduce net losses when a layer is hit. The net ratio is therefore higher than gross in quiet years and lower in large loss years.
Reinstatement premiums add a further effect. They are deducted from net premium in the loss year, so part of the recovery is given back through the premium line.
How reinstatements affect earnings is explored in why reinstatement economics is an earnings issue.
Worked Example: Quota Share vs Excess of Loss
The example below is illustrative and simplified. All figures are in USD millions; the cedent's gross position is earned premium of 1,000, incurred losses of 620 and expenses of 300.
Quota Share: 30% Cession, 33% Ceding Commission
| Item | Gross | Ceded | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earned premium | 1,000 | 300 | 700 |
| Incurred losses | 620 | 186 | 434 |
| Expenses (net of commission) | 300 | 99 (commission) | 201 |
| Loss ratio | 62.00% | 434 ÷ 700 = 62.00% | |
| Expense ratio | 30.00% | 201 ÷ 700 = 28.71% | |
| Combined ratio | 92.00% | 90.71% | |
| Underwriting result | 80 | 15 (reinsurer's margin) | 65 |
The net combined ratio improves by 1.29 points because the 33% commission exceeds the cedent's 30% expense ratio. Yet the underwriting result falls from 80 to 65, because the reinsurer keeps a margin of 15.
Excess of Loss: Cat Programme 250 xs 50, Premium 40, One Reinstatement at 100%
| Item | Gross, quiet year | Net, quiet year | Gross, cat year | Net, cat year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earned premium | 1,000 | 1,000 − 40 = 960 | 1,000 | 1,000 − 40 − 16 = 944 |
| Incurred losses | 620 | 620 | 620 + 150 = 770 | 770 − 100 = 670 |
| Expenses | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Loss ratio | 62.00% | 64.58% | 77.00% | 70.97% |
| Expense ratio | 30.00% | 31.25% | 30.00% | 31.78% |
| Combined ratio | 92.00% | 95.83% | 107.00% | 102.75% |
| Underwriting result | 80 | 40 | −70 | −26 |
In the cat year, a 150 event exceeds the 50 retention by 100, which is recovered. The reinstatement premium is 100 ÷ 250 × 40 = 16.
The gross combined ratio swings by 15.00 points between the two years. The net ratio swings by only 6.92 points, from 95.83% to 102.75%.
The lesson for CFOs and boards: a better net ratio is not the same as a better result, and a worse net ratio in a quiet year is the price of stability. Judge each cover on its margin and its effect on volatility, not on the direction of the ratio.
The lesson for reinsurers: cedents and analysts may read a quota share commission as performance improvement. Commission terms deserve the same scrutiny as price, because they shape how the cedent's results are perceived.
How Does IFRS 17 Change the Picture?
Under IFRS 17, reinsurance contracts held are presented separately from insurance contracts issued, and the cost of reinsurance is not deducted from insurance revenue. That changes how a net combined ratio is built.
Paragraph 86 of IFRS 17, quoted in IFRS Transition Resource Group staff material, lets an entity present reinsurance income or expense as a single amount or as recoveries and an allocation of premiums paid. If presented separately, amounts not contingent on claims, such as some ceding commissions, reduce the premium paid, and the allocation of premiums is not shown as a reduction in revenue.
IFRS 17 does not define a combined ratio. Each insurer sets its own definition, often using insurance revenue as the denominator and adding the net result from reinsurance contracts held.
Applying that approach to the quota share above gives a different number from the traditional net ratio.
| Basis | Calculation | Combined ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Gross | (620 + 300) ÷ 1,000 | 92.00% |
| Traditional net | (434 + 201) ÷ 700 | 90.71% |
| Gross revenue with net reinsurance result | (620 + 300 + 15) ÷ 1,000 | 93.50% |
The 15 is the net expense from reinsurance held: ceded premium of 300, less commission of 99, less recoveries of 186. The same economics produce three different ratios, so read the definition before comparing insurers.
When Does Net Look Better or Worse Than Gross?
The direction of the gap depends on the cover and the year. The table maps common situations to the usual effect and how to read it.
| Situation | Effect on net vs gross ratio | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| Quota share, commission above own expense ratio | Net looks better | Check the ceded margin; profit may still fall |
| Quota share, commission below own expense ratio | Net looks worse | The cedent is paying for capacity or capital |
| XoL in a quiet year | Net looks worse | This is the cost of protection, not underperformance |
| XoL in a large loss year | Net looks better | Check reinstatement premiums and any exhausted layers |
| Large prior-year recoveries | Net looks better | Separate prior-year effects from current-year performance |
| Reinsurer dispute or bad debt | Net looks worse | Recoverable quality, not underwriting, is driving the gap |
Which Mistakes Lead to Misreading Net Results?
Most misreadings come from treating the net ratio as a pure performance measure. These seven errors are the most common.
Reading a Lower Net Ratio as Higher Profit
A generous commission can lower the ratio while the cedent hands margin to the reinsurer. Always check the underwriting result in currency terms.
Comparing Insurers on Different Definitions
One insurer reports a traditional net ratio, another uses gross revenue with a net reinsurance result. The same economics can differ by several points.
Ignoring Reinstatement Premiums
Reinstatement premiums reduce net premium in the loss year. Leaving them out understates the cost of the event.
Treating XoL Cost as Underperformance
A higher net ratio in a quiet year is the price of protection. Judge it against volatility reduced and capital released.
Missing Prior-Year Effects
Recoveries on prior-year losses can flatter the current net ratio. Split current-year and prior-year effects.
Ignoring Recoverable Quality
A recovery booked but not collected improves the ratio only on paper. Disputed or ageing recoverables need separate disclosure.
Calculating Ceded Figures Manually
Commissions, sliding scales, profit commissions and reinstatements are often calculated in spreadsheets. Errors flow straight into the net ratio and are hard to trace.
How Should CFOs and Analysts Read Gross vs Net?
Read gross for underwriting quality, net for retained performance and the gap for reinsurance cost and dependence. A simple reconciliation makes the gap explainable.
Gross-to-Net Reconciliation
| Reconciling item | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Ceded premium by treaty | The spend on each cover |
| Ceding and profit commissions | How much of the expense ratio is funded by reinsurers |
| Recoveries, current and prior year | When reinsurance paid and for which years |
| Reinstatement premiums | The post-event cost of restoring cover |
| Ceded margin by treaty | The economic cost of each cover |
| Bad debt or disputed recoverables | Credit risk affecting the net result |
Which Questions Should Boards Ask?
- How much of the net ratio improvement comes from commission rather than underwriting?
- What is the ceded margin by treaty, in currency terms?
- How much did reinsurance reduce the volatility of the combined ratio over several years?
- Which combined ratio definition does management use, and is it consistent with peers?
Accurate ceded figures depend on correct treaty billing, as covered in billing the treaty correctly. For close-process controls, see the quarterly close for reinsurance.
What Does the Market Look Like for 2027?
Reinsurance pricing has softened through 2026, particularly on property catastrophe business. Lower XoL premiums narrow the gap between gross and net ratios in quiet years.
Softer markets also tend to bring richer proportional terms, including higher commissions. That can flatter net ratios, which makes the margin test in this guide more important, not less.
Checklist for CFOs and Heads of Reinsurance Accounting
Use this checklist before you publish or present gross and net results.
- The combined ratio definition and premium base are stated clearly
- Gross, net and the gross-to-net reconciliation are all presented
- Ceded margin is reported by treaty in currency terms
- Reinstatement premiums are shown as part of the event cost
- Prior-year recoveries are separated from current-year effects
- Disputed or ageing recoverables are disclosed separately
- The IFRS 17 presentation of reinsurance held is reconciled to the KPI
- Commissions, recoveries and reinstatements are calculated in a controlled system
For the last point, bordereaux reconciliation splits premiums and claims by reinsurer share and checks them against premium, claim and settlement records.
Key Terms
Combined ratio: The loss ratio plus the expense ratio. Below 100% indicates an underwriting profit.
Gross combined ratio: The combined ratio before reinsurance, using gross premiums, losses and expenses.
Net combined ratio: The combined ratio after reinsurance, using net premiums, net losses and expenses net of commissions.
Ceding commission: The amount a reinsurer pays a cedent on a proportional treaty to cover acquisition and administration costs.
Overriding commission: The part of a ceding commission that exceeds the cedent's actual expenses.
Ceded margin: Ceded premium minus ceding commission minus recoveries. It is the reinsurer's result on the cover.
Reinstatement premium: The additional premium paid to restore a layer's limit after a loss, usually pro rata as to amount.
Reinsurance contracts held: The IFRS 17 term for reinsurance a cedent buys, presented separately from insurance contracts issued.
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
How does reinsurance affect the combined ratio?
Reinsurance affects the combined ratio by changing the premium, losses and expenses in the calculation. A quota share with a generous ceding commission can lower the net ratio, while an excess of loss cover usually raises it in quiet years and lowers it in heavy loss years.
What is the difference between gross and net combined ratio?
The gross combined ratio measures underwriting performance before reinsurance, using gross premiums, losses and expenses. The net combined ratio measures the result after reinsurance, using net premiums, net losses and expenses net of ceding commissions. The gap shows the effect of the reinsurance programme.
Can a quota share improve the combined ratio but reduce profit?
A quota share can improve the combined ratio while reducing profit. When the ceding commission rate exceeds the cedent's own expense ratio, the net expense ratio falls, but the reinsurer still keeps a margin, so the cedent's underwriting profit in currency terms drops.
Why does excess of loss reinsurance raise the net combined ratio?
Excess of loss reinsurance raises the net combined ratio in years without large losses because its premium reduces net earned premium while no recoveries come back. In a catastrophe year the recoveries lower net losses, so the net combined ratio sits below the gross ratio.
How do reinstatement premiums affect the combined ratio?
Reinstatement premiums reduce net earned premium in the year of a loss, which pushes the net combined ratio up. Analysts should treat reinstatement premiums as part of the cost of the event rather than as ordinary reinsurance spend.
How does IFRS 17 change the combined ratio?
IFRS 17 presents reinsurance contracts held separately from insurance revenue, and ceding commissions not contingent on claims reduce the reinsurance premium. IFRS 17 does not define a combined ratio, so each insurer sets its own definition and analysts must read it carefully.
Which combined ratio should investors and boards use?
Investors and boards should use both gross and net combined ratios. The gross combined ratio shows underwriting quality, the net ratio shows retained performance, and the gap reveals reinsurance cost and dependence. Using only one hides important information.
Why does the net combined ratio vary less than the gross ratio?
The net combined ratio varies less than the gross ratio when excess of loss covers absorb large losses. That stability has a cost, which shows up as a higher net combined ratio in quiet years than the gross ratio for the same years.

Hitul Mistry
CEO, Insurnest
An InsurTech leader with more than a decade of experience across insurance and technology, focused on solving business problems with the help of technology. Has worked with brokers, insurance carriers, and reinsurance firms across the India, UAE, and US markets.
View LinkedIn profile →