Build-versus-buy decisions made without a total-cost view tend to look right on the day they're signed off and expensive two years later, once implementation and maintenance costs surface.
2026-09-01
Read moreDuplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting adds a subtle but real source of earnings volatility that most reinsurers never trace back to its cause.
2026-09-01
Read moreEliminating duplicate data entry between underwriting and accounting teams comes down to giving them one shared data path instead of two separate manual ones.
2026-09-01
Read moreDuplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting is worth running through a risk-appetite test, not just an operational efficiency review.
2026-09-01
Read moreDuplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting is a problem CFOs and COOs need to see together, since neither owns the full picture alone.
2026-09-01
Read moreDuplicate data entry across underwriting and accounting teams means the same policy number, premium, or treaty term gets typed by hand more than once.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs has a real, measurable P&L impact, showing up as renewal drift, mispriced exceptions, and slower recovery from disputes.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs can be captured before it walks out the door, by building lightweight documentation habits into the normal course of work.
2026-09-01
Read moreIf institutional knowledge kept getting lost in workflow handoffs, renewal quality and dispute outcomes would be the first things to break, and boards should watch both closely.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs forces reinsurance leaders to choose between relying on tenure and building systems that capture judgment on purpose.
2026-09-01
Read moreInstitutional knowledge lost in workflow handoffs is the cost of tribal knowledge leaving with the employee, taking years of undocumented judgment out the door in a single exit.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems has a real P&L cost, even though it rarely appears as its own line item.
2026-09-01
Read morePaying down integration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems works best as a staged roadmap, not a single big-bang project.
2026-09-01
Read moreBoards are starting to ask whether management can actually prove it has control of integration debt between core systems, not just describe it.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems forces a specific decision that reinsurance CTOs can only postpone, not avoid.
2026-09-01
Read moreIntegration debt between policy admin and reinsurance systems is the quiet reason every new feature takes longer to ship than the last one.
2026-09-01
Read moreLegacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures don't just create IT friction, they quietly erode margin and capital efficiency deal by deal.
2026-09-01
Read moreOperating controls can contain the risk of legacy core systems that can't support new treaty structures while a longer-term fix is planned, without pretending the workarounds are a permanent solution.
2026-09-01
Read more