Browse our resources

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks force a genuine executive decision, not just an actuarial update. Here is the decision framework reinsurance CEOs and CUOs need to use.

2026-09-08

A practical operating model for controlling ransomware severity after security control decay, covering continuous monitoring, renewal underwriting changes, and ownership before the next claim arrives.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay is emerging as a distinct executive risk, since decaying controls raise the cost and impact of each attack even when overall attack frequency stays flat.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay is eroding return on capital by bunching losses at the high end of the severity distribution, even as overall attack frequency and payment rates decline.

2026-09-08

Is your reinsurance strategy exposed to ransomware severity after security control decay? Board risk committees need specific questions to test whether management can see this risk before it becomes a severe claim.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay forces CUOs to decide how quickly to invest in control-recency verification, before the next renewal cycle prices another year of decayed controls blind.

2026-09-08

An early-warning system for technology supply-chain dependencies turns scattered vendor signals into a monitored, actionable control across a reinsurance portfolio.

2026-09-08

Technology supply-chain dependencies get treated as isolated vendor risk, when they actually behave as a shared concentration exposure across an entire portfolio.

2026-09-08

Boards need an explicit risk-appetite test for technology supply-chain dependencies before regulators or a real outage force the question onto the agenda.

2026-09-08

Technology supply-chain dependencies force a specific set of executive committee questions before renewal season, not after a correlated loss forces the answer.

2026-09-08

Technology supply-chain dependencies turn a single vendor outage into a correlated loss event that shows up directly in reinsurance earnings volatility.

2026-09-08

Treaty recapture decisions without customer impact analysis carry a measurable balance-sheet cost, from solvency ratio erosion to reserve strain. Here is how to size it.

2026-09-08

Treaty recapture decisions without customer impact analysis reach the P&L when operating controls are missing. Here are five control points that catch the risk earlier.

2026-09-08

Treaty recapture decisions without customer impact analysis expose reinsurers and cedants to hidden servicing and capital risk. Here is what leaders need to diagnose first.

2026-09-08

Board oversight of treaty recapture decisions without customer impact analysis needs a renewal-season stress test. Here is what that test should cover.

2026-09-08

Treaty recapture decisions without customer impact analysis are not a treasury matter alone. Here is why CEOs and CUOs need to own this on the executive agenda.

2026-09-08

Underwriting evidence that ages too quickly is an operating-controls problem as much as a data problem. Here is how better workflow design closes the gap for reinsurers.

2026-09-08

Underwriting evidence that ages too quickly does not just create a diagnosis problem, it quietly erodes margin and distorts capital across a reinsurance treaty. Here is how to size that cost.

2026-09-08