Reinsurance articles

Longevity concentration across pension transactions forces executive teams to decide how much correlated exposure to one demographic driver is acceptable. Here is the framework for that call.

2026-09-08

Longevity concentration across pension transactions turns a single demographic surprise into a correlated capital event. Here is how that earnings volatility builds and how to measure it.

2026-09-08

Solving medical trend outpacing treaty economics takes more than a diagnosis, it takes operating controls that catch the gap before it reaches the executive committee. Here is what those controls look like.

2026-09-08

Medical trend outpacing treaty economics quietly erodes life and health reinsurance margins long before a loss ratio confirms the damage. Here is how to spot the gap early.

2026-09-08

Boards overseeing life and health reinsurance need a clear answer to what breaks first if medical trend outpacing treaty economics continues unchecked. Here is the governance question worth asking now.

2026-09-08

Medical trend outpacing treaty economics forces a decision only executives can make: reprice, restructure, or hold. Here is the framework CFOs and CROs need to make that call.

2026-09-08

Medical trend outpacing treaty economics does more than shrink margin, it quietly ties up capital that could otherwise support new business. Here is how to measure the drag.

2026-09-08

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks need an operating fix, not just a strategic decision. Here is the practical process for catching and correcting drift before the next renewal.

2026-09-08

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks quietly erode margin and capital in life and health reinsurance long after the acute event has passed. Here is how to size the real cost.

2026-09-08

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks deserve direct board scrutiny in life and health reinsurance. Here are the questions a board should be asking and why.

2026-09-08

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks stop matching real experience because the tables were built for calmer health and social conditions. Here is why the gap opens and how reinsurers should read it.

2026-09-08

Mortality improvement assumptions after structural shocks force a genuine executive decision, not just an actuarial update. Here is the decision framework reinsurance CEOs and CUOs need to use.

2026-09-08

A practical operating model for controlling ransomware severity after security control decay, covering continuous monitoring, renewal underwriting changes, and ownership before the next claim arrives.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay is emerging as a distinct executive risk, since decaying controls raise the cost and impact of each attack even when overall attack frequency stays flat.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay is eroding return on capital by bunching losses at the high end of the severity distribution, even as overall attack frequency and payment rates decline.

2026-09-08

Is your reinsurance strategy exposed to ransomware severity after security control decay? Board risk committees need specific questions to test whether management can see this risk before it becomes a severe claim.

2026-09-08

Ransomware severity after security control decay forces CUOs to decide how quickly to invest in control-recency verification, before the next renewal cycle prices another year of decayed controls blind.

2026-09-08

An early-warning system for technology supply-chain dependencies turns scattered vendor signals into a monitored, actionable control across a reinsurance portfolio.

2026-09-08