Fixing silent technology exposure in legacy wordings takes a repeatable, measurable process, not a one-time legal review that quietly stalls after the first pass.
Silent technology exposure in legacy wordings is still sitting inside property, GL, and marine treaties written years before today's technology and AI risk existed.
Boards should require documented evidence, not general assurance, before accepting that silent technology exposure in legacy wordings is being managed rather than merely acknowledged.
Silent technology exposure in legacy wordings needs a leadership decision on sequencing and priority, not just a legal review buried inside the wording team's backlog.
Silent technology exposure in legacy wordings does not just create claims disputes, it quietly caps how much profitable new business a reinsurer can safely write.